Skip to main content

Author: dev

New European General Data Protection Regulation coming into force on 25 May 2018

12/03/2018  On 25 May 2018 the new European General Data Protection Regulation¹ will come into force, harmonizing the data protection rules in the EU. It will directly apply in all EU member states without the need for any national implementation laws (Art. 288 Treaty on the Functioning of the EU). The regulation provides for new data protection obligations of enterprises and sharpens existing ones. Further, fines for breaches have been increased significantly. On the same day, a revised German Federal Data Protection Act (Bundesdatenschutzgesetz) will come into force, specifying and sharpening some of the European data protection laws for Germany.

In short, the main duties for enterprises² under the new data protection rules are:

  • to maintain a record of processing activities,
  • to designate a data protection officer,
  • to carry out a data protection impact assessment,
  • to implement appropriate technical and organisational measures designed to implement data-protection principles and ensuring that, by default, only personal data which are necessary for each specific purpose of the processing are processed and ensuring a level of data security appropriate to the risk,
  • to notify a personal data breach promptly to the competent supervisory authority,
  • to cooperate on request with the supervisory authority.

Also, the information and other rights of affected natural persons (the “data subject”) have been strengthened.

Please contact us at JP Rechtsanwälte if you need help in complying with the new data protection rules.


¹ complete name: Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation)
² with exceptions for certain smaller enterprises

JP Rechtsanwälte advises Hahn Group on the sale of a retail portfolio consisting of 13 retail parks

15.02.2023 The Hahn Group has sold a portfolio of 13 retail parks for its institutional fund HAHN FCP-FIS – German Retail Fund.

JP Rechtsanwälte advised the Hahn Group on the transaction.

The established retail parks with a total lettable space of approx. 174,000 sqm are spread across Germany.

The buyer is CEV Handelsimmobilien GmbH, based in Hamburg.

 

Advisor The Hahn Group:
JP Rechtsanwälte
Dr. Jan Stoppel, Partner (Real Estate, M&A, Corporate)

 


About JP Rechtsanwälte:
JP Rechtsanwälte is a Cologne-based commercial law firm with an internationally focused boutique approach. JP Rechtsanwälte maintains an excellent international network. The main areas of advice are Corporate/M&A, Venture Capital, Commercial, Capital Markets and Real Estate.

Berlin appellate court accepts foreign notarisation of a GmbH formation

On 24 January 2018 the Higher Regional Court of Berlin (Kammergericht Berlin) decided that the notarisation of the formation of a German GmbH (limited liability company) by a Swiss notary in Canton Bern is valid and must therefore be registered in the German Commercial Register (case no. 22 W 25/16). The final and binding judgment was issued in connection with the – in comparison to Germany – significantly more flexible notary fees in Switzerland and the discussion of what extent the notarisation of German agreements can be transferred to Switzerland. The relevant norm for the notarisation abroad is Article 11 (1) EGBGB¹. It considers a transaction as valid if it complies with the form requirements of the so-called transaction law (that is the law applicable to the transaction itself = lex causae) or the form requirements of the state where it is consummated (so-called local law).

The court considered the notarisation in front of the Bern notary equivalent to the one before a German notary and therefore recognised the Swiss notarisation pursuant to the transaction law. This is as such not surprising because the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) in the past approved multiple times notarisations in Switzerland as equivalent (last in 2013 even after the coming into force of the MoMiG² and the Swiss GmbH-reform)³. It is worth noting, however, that the Berlin decision dealt with the formation of a GmbH and not only the transfer or pledge of shares in a GmbH. The appellate decision therefore goes, with its approval,  beyond prior judgements.

The decision strengthens the notarisation in Switzerland. Under certain conditions one may now even contemplate the notarisation of transactions which affect the constitution of the GmbH (like the formation, transformation, amendments to the articles) in certain Cantons of Switzerland, in particular when the involved values are particularly high.


¹ Introductory Act to the Civil Code (Einführungsgesetz zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch)
² Act on the modernisation of the GmbH law and on the combatting of abuses (Gesetz zur Modernisierung des GmbH-Rechts und zur Bekämpfung von Missbräuchen (MoMiG)) of 26.6.2008 (came into force on 1.11.2008)
³ BGH, resolution of 17.12.2013, case no. II ZB 6/13 (NJW 2014, 2026)

BGH invalidates written form cure clauses in lease agreements

By judgement of 27 September 2017 (case no. XII ZR 114/16) the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) declared so-called written form cure clauses generally invalid, no matter if they were agreed in general terms or negotiated individually.

Background of the decision is § 550 German Civil Code, according to which long-term lease agreements require written form. If the written form is not complied with the lease agreement has an indefinite term and can be terminated early with a statutory notice period. Since compliance with the written form may become difficult in practice (e.g. for side agreements) the market practice in the past often used so-called written form cure clauses pursuant to which both parties undertook in the lease agreement to cure possible form defects and not to terminate the lease agreement by reason of such defects. As the court cut the ground from under this practice the legal due diligence on compliance with the written form requirements is once again becoming more important.

New procedural law for German group insolvencies as of 24 April 2018

04/09/2017  On 24 April 2018, the Law to Facilitate the Management of Group Insolvencies (Gesetz zur Erleichterung der Bewältigung von Konzern­insolvenzen), which creates special procedural rules for German group insolvencies in the German Insolvency Code (InsO), will come into force. So far, there are no special rules in German insolvency law for group insolvencies so that the judicial responsibilities for insolvency proceedings of the respective group companies can fall apart and therefore, in the worst case, even different insolvency administrators can be appointed (which of course makes a uniform group-wide run-off or restructuring difficult). Since 26 June 2017, there are group insolvency procedural rules at European level (Art. 56 et seq. European Insolvency Regulation¹).
With the new German law, German group insolvency proceedings can be concentrated at a new group court venue (§§ 3a, 3d InsO). Furthermore, the insolvency courts will be obliged to consult each other on the appointment of a single insolvency administrator for the group companies (§ 56b InsO). However, a mandatory appointment of a single administrator has not been enacted in the law. If, despite these new rules, several insolvency administrators or different insolvency courts are involved, a duty of cooperation between the insolvency administrators and insolvency courts has been introduced (§§ 269a, 269b InsO). Furthermore, § 269c InsO permits the creation of an additional group creditors’ committee. Finally, the new law introduces a so-called coordination proceeding, which the insolvency court at the group court venue can initiate upon request (§ 269d InsO). In this case, the court appoints an independent procedural coordinator who attempts to harmonise the individual group insolvency proceedings, in particular by means of a so-called coordination plan (§§ 269e, 269f, 269h InsO).
The new law for German group insolvencies partly goes beyond the already mentioned European group insolvency rules in the European Insolvency Regulation (there is no uniform group court venue according to § 3a InsO in the European Insolvency Regulation), but remains behind the US American case law of substantive consolidation (i.e. the quasi-merger of insolvency estates of several debtors) in a joint administration.


¹ Regulation (EU) 2015/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on insolvency proceedings

SugarTrends GmbH advised by JP Rechtsanwälte on early-stage financing round

JP Rechtsanwälte advised SugarTrends GmbH – an online presence for local retailers – on another early-stage financing round. The financing round had a total volume in the high six-digit range. Both old and new investors participated in the financing round.

The Cologne-based startup SugarTrends operates a shopping portal that specifically focuses on maintaining local structures. Independent retailers worldwide can present themselves and their products on SugarTrends. Currently, retailers from over 400 shops from all over Europe are represented on the portal.

 

Legal Advisor SugarTrends GmbH:
JP Rechtsanwälte
Dr. Jens-Peter Eickhoff, Partner (M&A, Corporate Law)

Berlin appellate court accepts foreign notarisation of a merger of two GmbHs

On 26 July 2018 the Higher Regional Court of Berlin (Kammergericht Berlin) decided that the notarisation of the merger agreement and the merger resolutions for the merger of two German GmbHs (limited liability companies) by a Swiss notary in Canton Basel-Stadt is valid and must therefore be registered in the German Commercial Register (case no. 22 W 2/18). The final and binding decision was made in conformity with a previous decision of the same court dated 24 January 2018 which JP Rechtsanwälte has already examined in an earlier article.

The decision strengthens the notarisation in Switzerland further. Under certain conditions one may consider the notarisation of transactions which affect the constitution of the GmbH (like the formation, transformation, amendments to the articles) in certain Cantons of Switzerland, in particular when the involved values are particularly high.

 

Raffaele Sorrentino sells with JP Rechtsanwälte majority stake in concierge service provider RAS Services GmbH to DPF AG

18/06/2019  DPF AG, a company which specialises in senior residences with its subsidiary Tertianum Premium Residences, has acquired 70% of the concierge service provider RAS Services GmbH (formerly RAS – service at any time – GmbH & Co. KG) based in Berlin.

JP Rechtsanwälte, under the lead of its partner Dr. Jens-Peter Eickhoff, advised the seller and sole shareholder of RAS Services GmbH, Raffaele Sorrentino on the sale of his shares as part of a structured auction process.

RAS Services GmbH was founded about ten years ago by Raffaele Sorrentino, one of the best concierges in the world. RAS Services GmbH now offers its services in more than 70 properties and nine locations (including apartment buildings, offices and senior residences) in the DACH region. RAS Services GmbH continues to grow.

Legal Advisor Raffaele Sorrentino:
JP Rechtsanwälte
Dr. Jens-Peter Eickhoff, Partner (M&A, Corporate Law)
Mario Lindner, LL.M., Partner (Finance)

 


About JP Rechtsanwälte:
JP Rechtsanwälte (“JP”) is a Cologne-based commercial law firm with an internationally focused boutique approach. JP maintains an excellent international network, particularly in the Middle East. Our main practice areas are Corporate/M&A, Venture Capital, Commercial, Banking and Finance as well as Real Estate.

Germany suspends obligation to file for insolvency due to corona epidemic

30/03/2020  On 25 March 2020, the German Bundestag unanimously passed the draft law to suspend the obligation to file for insolvency until 30 September 2020 in order to protect companies that get into financial difficulties as a result of the corona epidemic (the Bundestag communication of 25 March 2020 can be found here; the draft law of 24 March 2020 can be found here). The Bundesrat approved the draft law in a special session on 27 March 2020.

The core elements of the new law are:

  • The obligation to file for insolvency is suspended until 30 September 2020 (the deadline can be extended to 31 March 2021 by statutory order).
  • The suspension of the obligation to file for insolvency does not apply if the insolvency is not caused by the consequences of the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus or if there are no prospects of eliminating an existing illiquidity.
  • If the debtor was not insolvent on 31 December 2019, it is assumed that the insolvency has been caused by the effects of the COVID 19 pandemic and there are prospects of eliminating an existing illiquidity.
  • Relief from liability for managers for payments after insolvency has occurred.
  • Restriction of insolvency administrators’ claw back rights
  • The right of creditors to file for insolvency is restricted for a period of three months, unless the debtor was already insolvent on 1 March 2020 (the three-month period can be extended to 31 March 2021 by statutory order).

 

The law was promulgated on 27 March 2020 and came into effect (retroactively) from 1 March 2020.

Please contact us at JP Rechtsanwälte if you need help.

 


About JP Rechtsanwälte:
JP Rechtsanwälte is a Cologne-based commercial law firm with an internationally focused boutique approach. JP maintains an excellent international network. Our main practice areas are Corporate/M&A, Venture Capital, Commercial, Finance and Restructuring as well as Real Estate.

Germany restricts landlords’ right to terminate a lease for non-payment of rent due to corona epidemic

01/04/2020  On 25 March 2020, the German Bundestag unanimously adopted the draft law restricting the right of landlords to terminate a lease in order to protect tenants who are unable to pay their rent as a result of the Corona epidemic (the Bundestag communication of 25 March 2020 can be found here; the draft law of 24 March 2020 can be found here). The Bundesrat approved the draft law in a special session on 27 March 2020.

The wording of the new legislation is as follows:

“The landlord cannot terminate a lease of real properties or rooms for the sole reason that the tenant does not pay the rent in the period from 1 April 2020 to 30 June 2020 despite being due, if the non-payment is due to the effects of the COVID 19 pandemic. The link between the COVID 19 pandemic and non-payment must be substantiated.”

The period for which the landlord’s termination is restricted by law in the event of non-payment of rent due to the corona epidemic can be extended if necessary by a statutory order of the Federal Government to the months July to September 2020 (and possibly even further with the approval of the Bundestag).

The new restriction of the right to terminate a lease applies to both residential and commercial properties.

The law was promulgated on 27 March 2020 and came into force on 1 April 2020.

Please contact us at JP Rechtsanwälte if you need help.

 


About JP Rechtsanwälte:
JP Rechtsanwälte is a Cologne-based commercial law firm with an internationally focused boutique approach. JP maintains an excellent international network. Our main practice areas are Corporate/M&A, Venture Capital, Commercial, Finance and Restructuring as well as Real Estate.